<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FAQ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smallsister.org/faq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smallsister.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 00:52:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeroen</title>
		<link>http://smallsister.org/faq/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeroen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://panic.smallsister.org/?page_id=31#comment-175</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-174&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@A. Mouse&lt;/a&gt; 
Hi,

I really don&#039;t think that spammer will try to send spam at this time. As you could read on the site, the spammer would need your smallsister address to start with. 

Second is that the TOR network is actually pretty slow and the spam messages need to be encrypted. This takes time, a lot me more time that it&#039;s been done now. So more time means less people to get spam.

Why do you think using the TOR network isn&#039;t a good idea? Is there an alternative? There are still a lot of people that setup a onion router.

Regards, Jeroen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-174" rel="nofollow">@A. Mouse</a><br />
Hi,</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t think that spammer will try to send spam at this time. As you could read on the site, the spammer would need your smallsister address to start with. </p>
<p>Second is that the TOR network is actually pretty slow and the spam messages need to be encrypted. This takes time, a lot me more time that it&#8217;s been done now. So more time means less people to get spam.</p>
<p>Why do you think using the TOR network isn&#8217;t a good idea? Is there an alternative? There are still a lot of people that setup a onion router.</p>
<p>Regards, Jeroen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Mouse</title>
		<link>http://smallsister.org/faq/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://panic.smallsister.org/?page_id=31#comment-174</guid>
		<description>First, could you think of a way to keep spam out? Thinking of what happened to usenet and email.

Second, recently people went to jail because their onion router transfered illegal material and judges dont understand anything technical, as a result lots of people stopped running tor. Same thing happened to freenet. Suppose you cant keep the bad guys out either? So, using the tor network might not be such a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, could you think of a way to keep spam out? Thinking of what happened to usenet and email.</p>
<p>Second, recently people went to jail because their onion router transfered illegal material and judges dont understand anything technical, as a result lots of people stopped running tor. Same thing happened to freenet. Suppose you cant keep the bad guys out either? So, using the tor network might not be such a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
